Qualify on 12 or 24 months of bank deposits, or on a profit and loss statement from your CPA. No tax returns.
Private, and nothing is shared. Prefer to talk? Call or text Nick: 916-805-1933.
No credit pull to start and no obligation. One phone number is the whole first step. You keep the numbers either way, including the ones that say wait.
A bank statement loan qualifies a self-employed California borrower on 12 or 24 months of bank deposits instead of tax returns. Personal or business statements both work, and a profit and loss statement from your CPA is a second route. Nick Nagy brokers both through Loan Factory, Inc., which publishes 237 lenders across 48 states.
Source: Loan Factory, Inc. published figures, loanfactory.com, read 2026-08-06."Sick of banks/credit unions treating me like dirt for being self employed."reddit.com, r/smallbusiness, read 2026-09-04
You are sitting across from someone with your tax return in front of them. The number at the bottom is the only number their guideline book lets them use. You know what the business actually did last year. They are not arguing with you. They are reading one line, because that is the line the rule tells them to read.
Your accountant did exactly what you pay them for. The same paperwork that lowered the tax bill is the paperwork the underwriter reads. Good tax work and easy approval pull in opposite directions. That is a documentation rule, not a verdict on your business.
There is more than one documentation rule. Most people never get told that, because the first company they ask only has one.
"Bank Statement Loan-How Are Banks Calculating Income?"reddit.com, r/Mortgages, read 2026-09-04
You added up twelve months of deposits yourself and got a number you were happy with. The number a lender uses will not be that number, and nobody explains why until late.
A lender averages the qualifying deposits across the look-back period, and qualifying is narrower than your running total. Money you moved between your own accounts is generally not new income, so it usually comes back out. That single rule is the most common reason a first pass lands lower than expected.
What we do: your deposits prove your income. We look at 12 or 24 months, personal or business, and no tax returns. Then we file it wherever it qualifies you highest.
Send complete statements for every account, including the ones you think are irrelevant. A gap the underwriter has to guess at is what turns a quick file into a slow one.
Every ad in this category prints a requirement list. Not one of them tells you which of your own deposits will not count.
"Is it much harder to qualify for a mortgage as a 1099 employee?"reddit.com, r/homeowners, read 2026-09-04
One company told you that you are self-employed. Another told you that you are not. Both were reading the same 1099.
Harder is the wrong word for it. It is documented differently. A 1099 contractor, a consultant, a realtor paid per closing and an owner taking distributions all look different in the account.
Deposits that arrive in a steady rhythm read one way. Deposits that arrive three times a year read another. That is where your CPA's profit and loss statement can do better work than raw deposits.
| The document | What you send | How the income is counted | When it reads best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Personal bank statements | 12 or 24 months of your personal accounts | Qualifying deposits, averaged, with no expense factor taken out | The business income lands in your personal account |
| Business bank statements | 12 or 24 months of the business accounts | Qualifying deposits, averaged, less an expense factor for running the business | Most of the money moves through the business |
| A profit and loss statement | A statement prepared by your CPA | From the profit your CPA reports, not from raw deposits | Deposits arrive in lumps, or the year was seasonal |
Our route is built around a statement from your CPA. Whether a program will read one you prepared yourself is set program by program, so it is a live check.
What we do: we run both routes before either one gets filed, and send the one that qualifies you higher. Both sit on the same shelf of lenders.
The ads name bank statements and profit and loss in the same breath. None of them says which one your income should use, or that picking wrong costs you buying power.
"Low pre-approval for bank statement loan"reddit.com, r/Mortgages, read 2026-09-04
You read a requirement list on an ad and decided you were inside it. The number that came back was far below what you expected.
A published requirement list belongs to one lender. It is out of date the day that lender moves a guideline. Right now the active ads in this category advertise three different minimum credit scores. The bank behind one of those ads publishes a much higher minimum on its own site.
Credit and down payment trade against each other here. A stronger score buys room on the down payment, and more money down buys room on the score. Which combination your file supports is a live check.
What we do: we do not publish a box. One file goes across 237 lenders at Loan Factory. A file outside one company's minimum lands on the shelf instead of in a no.
The longest-running ads in this category are a bulleted underwriting box. A box turns everyone outside it into a no. A shelf turns them into a different lender.
You found the rental you want and the numbers work on paper. Then someone asks for two years of tax returns.
Primary residence, second home and investment property all run on bank statement qualification. Which one you are buying changes the pricing and the down payment. It is one of the first questions, not a detail at the end.
On a rental there is a second route worth pricing beside this one. The property's own rent can carry the loan instead of your income.
When the other option wins: the rent covers the payment comfortably and your deposits are lumpy. If the rent is thin and your deposits are strong, this route is the stronger file. We price both and show you the gap.
The rent-qualified route in full: DSCR loans in California.
Every requirement list in the category names all three occupancy types. None of them tells an investor that a second structure might beat it.
"Cash out refi with no income check"reddit.com, r/Mortgages, read 2026-09-04
You have real equity and a first mortgage rate you never want to touch again. Every answer you get starts with the word refinance.
Bank statement qualification works on a refinance the same way it works on a purchase. Rate and term and cash-out both run on it. A low tax return does not lock you out of your own equity.
Replacing the whole loan is right less often than it gets recommended. A second position leaves your first loan where it is. The honest test is a subtraction, not a rate: compare the blended cost across everything you owe. A cash-out genuinely wins when the first mortgage was never priced well.
What we do: we shop the second position and the cash-out side by side before recommending either. A bigger loan pays the person arranging it more, which is worth saying out loud.
The equity ads in this category all sell speed. None of them shows you the case where leaving the first loan alone is the cheaper answer.
You have read a dozen ads for this. Every one ended with the same question: see if you qualify. None of them told you what it costs.
Alternative documentation programs are priced for the extra underwriting work and the extra risk, so they generally sit above conventional pricing. No rate and no fee is printed on this page, because a rate with no file behind it is a guess. You get real numbers on a call, dated, with what they rest on.
Inside that category the price is set by competition, not by one company. One application goes across 237 lenders at Loan Factory. The rate you get is the best one available that day across all of them, not one company's best. It is still alternative documentation pricing, so it starts above a standard program.Source: Loan Factory, Inc. published figures, loanfactory.com, read 2026-08-06.
If your tax return actually supports a conventional loan, that route usually costs less over time. Take it. If it does not, this program buys you the house instead of a smaller one.
What we do: we run the standard program, the bank statement program and the P&L program against each other before recommending one. When the standard program wins, we say so. Sometimes the money sits in assets instead, and those assets can qualify you on their own.
Not one active ad in this category states a cost, a trade-off, or a case where the reader should do something else. That silence is the loudest thing about the whole category.
23 years in California lending · NMLS 314880 · CA DRE 01444600 · Loan Factory, Inc.
You get more than two decades of California lending on your file, from someone who reads self-employed income for a living.
One file goes across 237 lenders at Loan Factory instead of one company's guideline book. That is what makes the answer defensible rather than a preference.
When your tax return actually supports a standard program, that program usually prices better, and that is the answer you get.
You write an offer with a number that holds, and nobody at the table has to hear about your Schedule C.
One file, 237 lenders competing for it, and a broker who has done this for 23 years.
Loan Factory, Inc. is the brokerage. These are its published figures.
A retail bank underwrites your file to one guideline book. When a self-employed file does not fit that book, the answer is no, and the reason is rarely explained. A broker sends the same file across the shelf and places it where it already fits.
The questions self-employed buyers and owners actually type, answered in the order they get asked.
A bank statement loan qualifies you on your bank deposits instead of the net income on your tax return. A lender looks back over 12 or 24 months of statements and averages the deposits that qualify. Personal statements or business statements both work. It is built for people whose tax return understates what the business actually brought in.
No. The whole point of the program is that your deposits do the work your tax return normally does. That is not the same as no documentation. A lender still has to make a good-faith effort to determine you can repay. That is the ability-to-repay rule (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Ask CFPB 1789, read 2026-09-04). Your statements are that documentation.
They average the qualifying deposits over the look-back period, and qualifying is narrower than your own running total. Money moved between your own accounts is generally not new income, so it usually comes out. Business statements have an expense factor applied to reflect the cost of running the business.
Both exist, and which one your file uses depends on the lender and on how steady the deposits are. Seasonal income often reads better across 24 months, because one slow quarter carries less weight. A strong recent year can read better across 12. We run it both ways before choosing one.
Either, and they are not counted the same way. Business statements carry an expense factor and personal statements do not. The same year of income can produce two different qualifying numbers. Run both, and file whichever one qualifies you higher.
Credit floors on these programs are set lender by lender, and they move. Ads in this category currently advertise several different minimums. The lender behind one of them publishes a much higher one on its own site. That spread is why the file goes across a shelf rather than to one company. Your answer comes from a live check.
Credit and down payment move together on these programs, so there is no single number. Which combination your file supports is a live check against current guidelines, not a figure from an article.
They are priced for the extra underwriting work and the extra risk, so they generally sit above conventional pricing. If your tax return actually supports a conventional loan, that route usually costs less over time. That is what we will tell you.
Yes. Rate and term refinances and cash-out refinances both run on bank statement qualification. If the point is to reach equity without giving up a low first mortgage rate, look at a second position. It is often a better subtraction than replacing the whole loan. We price it both ways.
Yes. Primary residence, second home and investment property are all common on these programs. On a rental there is a second route worth pricing beside it. The property's own rent can carry the loan instead of your income. Which wins depends on the rent, the down payment and your deposits.
Yes. A profit and loss statement prepared by your CPA is a second route to the same place. It sits on the same shelf of lenders. Some files read better on a P&L than on raw deposits, particularly when the deposits are lumpy. We look at both before picking one.
That is set program by program, so it is checked live rather than assumed. Our profit and loss route is built around a statement prepared by your CPA. Whether a program will read a self-prepared statement is a question for that program, not a rule we can publish.
Lenders set their own minimum and it differs by program, so this is one of the first things checked rather than assumed. A single company's answer gets mistaken for the market's answer. If one lender's minimum rules you out, that is one lender.
Yes. Bank statement qualification pairs with bridge and buy-before-you-sell structures. A self-employed move-up buyer can purchase the next home first and sell afterward. That removes the home-sale condition from your offer, which is the part a seller could not plan around.
This page answers California, and the same programs run wherever the company is licensed. Loan Factory, Inc. publishes that it is licensed in 48 states (loanfactory.com, read 2026-08-06). If you are buying in another state, the question is worth asking.
It is Sunday night and the tab you keep reopening is a house someone already told you that you cannot afford.
You can call companies one at a time and ask each one how it reads deposits. The answers will differ, and that is the part that costs people the house.
A file that never gets read the second way stays a no from the first company that read it. That verdict does not expire on its own.