A sale ends your low property tax base for good, which is the real thing behind the fear of a one way trip. Renting the house keeps the option open, and it turns a financing question into a landlord question instead.
Run this answer against my numbers → No credit pull to start · No obligationSelling a Murrieta home before leaving California ends the low tax base you have now for good, which is the real fear behind "you can never come back." Renting the house instead keeps that door open, and it is a landlord decision more than a mortgage decision once the loan is set up to match it.
Each one is answered further down this page, and any one can move the outcome on a specific file.
A stored answer tells you how the rule works. It cannot tell you what your file supports, because it has never seen your file. That part gets run on your actual numbers, and you keep the written version either way.
Answered by Nick Nagy · 23 years · NMLS 314880 · CA DRE 01444600 · Mortgage financing through Loan Factory, 237 lenders · Run this answer against my numbers →
Part of the California Mortgage Answer Desk, and of the Murrieta questions.
One commenter on r/relocating framed the calculation plainly: "Because the thing about leaving California is, sometimes it can be very difficult or impossible to go back." The difficulty is not sentimental. It is that a sale ends your current property tax base under Prop 13, and a return purchase years later gets assessed fresh, at whatever the market has become by then.
That is a real cost of selling, and it is worth naming directly rather than treating the decision as only about the move itself. Renting the house instead of selling it sidesteps that reset entirely, because the reassessment triggers on a change of ownership, not on where you live.
Another commenter described the same math from the other direction on r/orangecounty: "That’s why I’m scared of leaving California. There’s no coming back… Murrieta CA and bought double the house plus pool for the same price." The size and price gap between coastal California and Murrieta is real, and it is exactly what makes selling and buying elsewhere feel permanent.
Renting the Murrieta house does not erase that decision, it postpones it, and it comes with its own carrying costs and management questions once you are no longer local. What it does change on the financing side is the loan itself: once the home is a rental rather than an owner-occupied primary, a lender treats it differently, and a DSCR loan, which qualifies off the property’s own rent instead of a new job in a new state, is often the more accurate fit than a standard refinance.
Whichever way this goes, the honest version runs the actual numbers, rental income against carrying cost against what a sale would net after tax, before deciding on the fear of the reset alone. That is a bigger decision than a forum thread can settle, which is exactly why it is worth running with real numbers on the actual house.
For the property side of this decision, Anthony Lauria works these streets; the financing side is mine.
If you sell your house, you’ll never be able to move back. If you sell, it’s a one way trip to Florida. Temecula and Murrieta are very nice.
r/relocating, captured 2026-09-04 (LH2 situation sweep)
If nobody gave a straight answer in that thread, that is not the person missing something. The answer depends on a specific file and a specific address.
23 years in California lending · NMLS 314880 · CA DRE 01444600 · Loan Factory, Inc.
Dual licensed, so the loan side and the real estate side of a move get looked at as one problem instead of two. Most of what goes wrong in a move is a timing problem wearing a financing costume, and it is cheaper to catch it before you write an offer than after.
One file, 237 lenders competing for it, and a broker who has done this for 23 years.
Loan Factory, Inc. is the brokerage. These are its published figures.
A retail bank has one guideline book. A broker shops the same file across the shelf and finds the lender whose box it already fits.
The follow-on questions, answered in the order they get asked.
That depends on whether you value the flexibility to return more than the proceeds and simplicity of a clean sale. Selling ends your current property tax base for good, which is the cost behind the "one way trip" fear. Renting keeps the option open and turns the house into a landlord decision, usually financed with a DSCR loan that qualifies off the property’s own rent rather than a new out of state income.
Generally yes. A sale ends the Prop 13 base you have now, and a later purchase, in Murrieta or anywhere else in the state, gets assessed at whatever the market price is at that time, unless a Prop 19 exception for age 55 and up, severe disability, or a disaster applies.
The loan usually changes along with the use. A DSCR loan qualifies the property based on its own rental income instead of the borrower’s W-2, which fits a homeowner who is relocating and keeping the house as a rental behind them.
Nothing stops you from buying again later, but you would requalify at whatever rates and prices exist then, and the new purchase would be assessed fresh rather than at your current tax base. That reset is the real cost the "never coming back" fear is describing.
Send the address or the listing link and every line of that payment comes back in writing.
A stored answer tells you how the rule works. The Murrieta True Payment Check runs it on the property you are actually looking at, in writing, and you keep it either way.